Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

added 21 characters in body
Source Link
Dave Newton
Dave Newton
  • 10.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 42

IME these types of questions tend to get closed.

That said, I'd be opposed to flagging questions based solely on (perceived) legality.

If I had moral objections to it I just wouldn't answer, if I felt strongly enough I'd leave a comment, and let it go–not my business unless I'm a named (or likely) target. IMO flagging based

Flagging on quality, locality, and the other standard flagsstandards is enough: if they don't apply, don't flag.

IME these types of questions tend to get closed.

That said, I'd be opposed to flagging questions based solely on (perceived) legality.

If I had moral objections to it I just wouldn't answer, if I felt strongly enough I'd leave a comment, and let it go–not my business unless I'm a named (or likely) target. IMO flagging based on quality, locality, and the other standard flags is enough.

IME these types of questions tend to get closed.

That said, I'd be opposed to flagging questions based solely on (perceived) legality.

If I had moral objections to it I just wouldn't answer, if I felt strongly enough I'd leave a comment, and let it go–not my business unless I'm a named (or likely) target.

Flagging on quality, locality, and the other standards is enough: if they don't apply, don't flag.

Source Link
Dave Newton
Dave Newton
  • 10.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 42

IME these types of questions tend to get closed.

That said, I'd be opposed to flagging questions based solely on (perceived) legality.

If I had moral objections to it I just wouldn't answer, if I felt strongly enough I'd leave a comment, and let it go–not my business unless I'm a named (or likely) target. IMO flagging based on quality, locality, and the other standard flags is enough.