Timeline for Suspend review privileges if community disagrees a lot
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2013 at 19:44 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/152540/… (also touched on here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/152709/… and here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/179929/…) | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 22:48 | comment | added | Brad Larson Mod | I'm not sure that this is necessary, because the suggested edit audits appear to be doing a great job in removing the worst rubber-stamp approvers from that queue. As others have said, I've seen cases where three of the reviewers were in the wrong (in one instance, all three are now banned from the queue). | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 22:33 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | As long as it doesn't go the other way; I've been the lone dissenter way too much it seems. | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 22:29 | comment | added | Bart | Phew. Got lucky there then. ;) | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 22:28 | comment | added | Doorknob | @Bart Actually no, your ratio is about 1.17. | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 22:27 | comment | added | Bart | This Bart is far too positive as well. Ban him! Funny though, I was about to write something similar about another such user I just encountered. (2742 edit suggestions approved and 18 rejected) | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 22:23 | history | asked | Doorknob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |