Timeline for Suggested Edit audits: who gets audited?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2013 at 16:34 | comment | added | Bo Persson | One reason for skipping obvious audits is to save the prescious votes for something better. I sometimes consider doing that, to earn an extra reject vote. :-) | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 16:16 | comment | added | Toon Krijthe | A couple of days ago there was a post mentioning 1 in 20 reviews. | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 16:09 | comment | added | Servy | I am really interested in the second option though; perhaps there will need to be some mod tool to indicate an overly high percentage of skips on audit items (if such a thing doesn't already exist). | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 16:07 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | @Servy - that was my gut feeling as well; hopefully this will at least help the algorithms being used to be refined | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 16:05 | comment | added | Servy |
How does the system determine who gets audited and who doesn't? My guess is you won't get an answer for that and that it will remain "undisclosed".
|
|
| Feb 21, 2013 at 15:48 | history | asked | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |