Timeline for Turbocharging the Roomba: solutions for premature deletion
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 6, 2015 at 18:14 | comment | added | jmoreno | Yeah, bad questions with bad answers are still bad questions. "can I have a dollar.", should be deleted as offtopic not answered with "no" | |
| Sep 25, 2013 at 15:08 | comment | added | gnat | your concern looks reasonable - accepted answers immunity feels indeed slippery to me. As explained in hotness formula post, "accepted answers are a fine social contract, but not a good data point for question or answer quality" - meaning it doesn't really indicate a valuable content. I can imagine this as sort of protection for new users who might need time to get rep for upvote privilege, fine - but even then, I can't see how keeping zero-score, unattended answers is justified for more than, say, a year | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 1:53 | history | answered | Zelda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |