Timeline for Why can you vote (up or down) every two seconds (again)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Apr 5, 2013 at 14:02 | comment | added | VonC | @MartinSmith "and is surely indicative that votes aren't being cast with consideration for the content.": exactly! I am not sure of the right solution though... | |
| Apr 5, 2013 at 13:28 | comment | added | Martin Smith | I don't agree it is the same issue as comments. It is quite easy to be able to read and try and upvote multiple comments and hit the time limit in the course of normal activities. Upvoting multiple answers on different questions within 2 seconds is not something I would normally hit and is surely indicative that votes aren't being cast with consideration for the content. | |
| Apr 5, 2013 at 13:27 | comment | added | VonC | I agree too. Contrary to my old questions, this time the upvotes are grouped together as to not trigger the invalidation. | |
| Apr 5, 2013 at 13:21 | history | answered | juergen d | CC BY-SA 3.0 |