Timeline for How many comments are required to qualify a post as "debated"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Apr 10, 2013 at 16:13 | comment | added | Andrew Barber Mod | +1 for referencing one of the foremost authorities on this site! ;) | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34 | comment | added | Nicol Bolas | @GiacomoTesio: Sure you do. All programming style questions are "likely to result in a debate". That's because the answers are debatable; they are based on opinion, not facts. No question about "anti-patterns" can be answered objectively (whether for functional programming or any other programming style), because everyone has their own set of those. Furthermore, your question is a list question, which is also not constructive. | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 10:46 | comment | added | Giacomo Tesio | I understood what Andrew means, but he didn't explain how you can know that such question is "likely to result in a debate", if you don't know enough about functional programming to provide a single answer. | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 10:03 | history | answered | user213634 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |