Timeline for Could authors overturn recent community review decisions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2022 at 2:08 | history | edited | bad_coder |
Search edit. Added relevant tags.
|
|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| S Apr 26, 2017 at 11:08 | history | bounty ended | Ry- | ||
| S Apr 26, 2017 at 11:08 | history | notice removed | Ry- | ||
| S Apr 22, 2017 at 4:19 | history | bounty started | Ry- | ||
| S Apr 22, 2017 at 4:19 | history | notice added | Ry- | Reward existing answer | |
| Apr 22, 2017 at 0:29 | vote | accept | zneak | ||
| Apr 22, 2017 at 0:26 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 140 | |
| Apr 22, 2017 at 0:12 | history | edited | Shog9 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 11, 2014 at 0:13 | history | edited | zneak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added yet another case of the community taking stupid decisions
|
| May 2, 2014 at 17:39 | comment | added | zneak | @Kevin, there is a 30-minute gap between the time the edit was accepted and the time it was reverted. Since only one line changed, I'm not sure how it could have been a conflict. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 17:15 | history | edited | zneak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 626 characters in body
|
| Oct 26, 2013 at 22:12 | history | edited | zneak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added another example of an edit gone wrong
|
| Jul 13, 2013 at 9:23 | comment | added | Richard Tingle | Related: Allow the owner of a post to approve a suggested edit even if it was rejected by reviewers | |
| S Jul 13, 2013 at 8:49 | history | suggested | Old Checkmark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
seamlessly integrated the suggested edit link into the post
|
| Jul 13, 2013 at 8:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 13, 2013 at 8:49 | |||||
| Jul 13, 2013 at 5:10 | history | edited | zneak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 302 characters in body
|
| Jun 3, 2013 at 16:12 | answer | added | Tim Down | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:23 | answer | added | Servy | timeline score: 11 | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:13 | answer | added | ʞunɥdɐpɐɥd | timeline score: -2 | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:09 | answer | added | Richard J. Ross III | timeline score: -3 | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:07 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | On most SE sites, this isn't an issue since edit approvals are much slower, but on Stack Overflow, normally the OP doesn't get more than a couple of minutes to review an edit before the community reviewers handle it. It would be nice if the OP could go back and retroactively approve a rejected edit. I don't think there should be a mechanism to overturn an edit approval though. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:03 | comment | added | Richard J. Ross III | Yes, you can share review links FYI. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 14:59 | history | asked | zneak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |