Timeline for Could authors overturn recent community review decisions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jul 13, 2013 at 9:32 | comment | added | Richard Tingle | Often (especially with code edits) the community rejects an edit because they can't know if that was the function the OP had in mind however there is one person who does know; the OP | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:26 | comment | added | ʞunɥdɐpɐɥd | Yes but my point is why letting users vote on a review if the OP has the power to revert that vote..It's the absolute opposite of the voting principle. If the commnunity decided that the edit is not valid well I think that's how it should stay. And also the OP can always check the changes and make them himself like you said. I would personally not reject a fixed link edit but as stated in my answer it's only my opinion. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:23 | comment | added | zneak | The user already has that power. I'm suggesting a button for it. There's still a point in having the community perform reviews, as some answers have been posted by users that don't go to Stack Overflow on a regular basis. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:13 | history | answered | ʞunɥdɐpɐɥd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |