Timeline for Flagging obsolete comment conversations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Nov 13, 2014 at 12:05 | history | suggested | Jan Doggen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 'through flag/other' beacuse I had to look up 'how then?'
|
| Nov 13, 2014 at 11:19 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 13, 2014 at 12:05 | |||||
| Aug 12, 2013 at 15:27 | comment | added | Bernhard Barker |
@psubsee2003 I mainly use obsolete, and, to date, 99% of my comment flags have been approved. You may need to spend some time looking at the comments you're flagging and whether they are truly obsolete, and whether someone who just popped in can easily see that they are.
|
|
| Aug 12, 2013 at 15:21 | comment | added | Bernhard Barker | @RiaD Lazy mods? I always flag all comments I believe to be obsolete, this seems to work well enough. | |
| Jul 9, 2013 at 22:35 | comment | added | RiaD | quite often I flag 1 of comments and say "all/most comments in conversation are obsolete now" or smth like this and the mod delete only flagged one. | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 21:44 | vote | accept | Mark Amery | ||
| Jun 2, 2013 at 15:44 | comment | added | psubsee2003 |
More often than not, when I flag obsolete comments, the flag is declined. Is there any suggestion for doing it so they aren't declined and actually get deleted? Should I use the other flag more often and the obsolete flag less often?
|
|
| Jun 2, 2013 at 11:37 | history | answered | George StockerMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |