Timeline for Who's supposed to stop spam on the Bitcoin SE site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ with https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 3:26 | comment | added | John Bensin | @AnnaLear Do you have any suggestions for alerting the community to meta posts? I joined the bitcoin site when a few of my answers were migrated there, and even coming from another beta site, the meta on bitcoin seems deserted. I've even flagged questions for moderator attention, hoping to notify someone about them, but most of the recent discussions, including LBT's post about the backlog of the review queue, seem to be LBT, another user, and myself alone. | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 18:40 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @LBT There's not much we can do about it. It's not like if you email us, we're going to swoop in and clear the queues. :) We might help out and we generally keep an eye on this sort of thing across all sites, but it really is up to the community to sort itself out. Posting a discussion on the Bitcoin Meta site would be a good starting point to try and rally the community together. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 14:24 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | @AnnaLear - Interesting, thanks for the update! Also, good grief that is clogged, all around. For future reference, would it be better to e-mail [email protected], ping you here, or just patiently wait for situations at Bitcoin.se? I hate to be a pest, but I find weird things to fixate on. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 14:14 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @LBT Ah, the "recommend closure" flags. Mods don't see those anymore, so I keep forgetting about them. They just go into review and that does seem to be a bit backlogged. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 14:12 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | @AnnaLear - I'm showing 5 active flags, for bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/12575/…, bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/13119/…, bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/12975/…, bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/12385/… and bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/12384/… (flagged July 29th). | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 14:07 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @LBT There are two unhandled flags on Bitcoin right now, both of them from a few hours ago. All of yours have been resolved as far as I can tell. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 13:18 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | @BitcoinFan - Yeah, I've got flags open since mid-July, and suggested edits that just sit there for days at a time. The site is apparently a ghost town. | |
| Jul 25, 2013 at 21:49 | comment | added | user228226 | @AnnaLear also the mods dont go on the meta site it looks like so i dont think tey would see anything i post. look at this question (meta.bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/439/…) also if you look at mod users (meta.bitcoin.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) they dont visit or at least they dont respond to questions | |
| Jul 25, 2013 at 13:37 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | @AnnaLear - any progress on this? I'm a relative newcomer to the BitCoin site, but I'm a little concerned about the moderation there. This question has gone unanswered for multiple days, despite the fact that all moderators have been on at some point since then. Combined with the fact that I still have flags that are days-old and unattended, I get the impression there that no one cares. In fact, I'm pretty concerned with the quality of the questions in general. | |
| Jul 18, 2013 at 17:13 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @LBT Yeah, we're in the process of appointing a fourth now. | |
| Jul 18, 2013 at 17:04 | comment | added | LittleBobbyTables - Au Revoir | I'm only recently familiar with the BitCoin site because of this thread, but I'm starting to think a fourth moderator is needed. This question has been sitting around for 6 hours, and two of the moderators haven't been on today yet to even see it. You would think there are enough users active on the site that the question would be flagged as spam enough to be deleted, but apparently not. | |
| Jul 17, 2013 at 11:23 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 16, 2013 at 20:36 | comment | added | Undo | I was going to go find something of theirs worthy of an upvote, but... They haven't done anything on BTC.SE. | |
| Jul 16, 2013 at 20:23 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @user7116 Good catch. It shouldn't be too hard to get 5 reputation, though. | |
| Jul 16, 2013 at 20:00 | comment | added | user7116 | I don't think the OP has the 5 reputation required to participate on their meta. | |
| Jul 16, 2013 at 19:06 | history | answered | Adam LearStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |