Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2017 at 12:36 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:50 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Aug 8, 2013 at 18:28 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' @Bart I'd rather err on the side of accepting edits that break the code than on the side of rejecting edits that correct the code. Edits that break the code can be corrected. If we never accept edits that correct the code, the code will stay wrong forever.
Aug 8, 2013 at 18:17 comment added Bart The proposed message is of course just that: a proposal. It could be rephrased in any more desirable way. But you make several good points, as did Shog. Perhaps it would be worth considering the other side: Say we take a more code-edit-friendly stance as a community, then what can we do to have better reviews. Accepting the odd bit of terrible formatting is nasty. But accepting wrong code is worse. As is the rejection of actual good corrections because of a lack of knowledge. But well, that's just me rambling off the top of my head a the moment. +1 anyway. Thanks for the input.
Aug 8, 2013 at 15:52 history answered Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' CC BY-SA 3.0