Timeline for Highlight comments from answer author, in addition to question author
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| Jul 9, 2018 at 18:15 | answer | added | geekley | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 22, 2016 at 8:26 | comment | added | Andrew Grimm | An example of where highlighting the answer author is useful: stackoverflow.com/questions/9283472/… | |
| Aug 7, 2015 at 13:20 | answer | added | James | timeline score: -1 | |
| S Mar 31, 2015 at 10:23 | history | bounty ended | Tim | ||
| S Mar 31, 2015 at 10:23 | history | notice removed | Tim | ||
| Mar 27, 2015 at 13:39 | answer | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 27, 2015 at 12:51 | comment | added | Tim | @ᔕᖺᘎᕊ Post it and I'll give you half the bounty! | |
| Mar 27, 2015 at 10:47 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | @Tim (might not be worth an answer; but till then, you can use my userscript :) | |
| S Mar 24, 2015 at 21:27 | history | bounty started | Tim | ||
| S Mar 24, 2015 at 21:27 | history | notice added | Tim | Current answers are outdated | |
| Jan 5, 2015 at 17:18 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | I've made a userscript for this. You can see it at StackApps stackapps.com/questions/5075/answerer-name-comment-highlighter | |
| Aug 1, 2010 at 22:33 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 1, 2010 at 22:31 | history | edited | user50049 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 1, 2010 at 21:59 | history | edited | nb69307 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 329 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Sep 2, 2009 at 10:54 | comment | added | Sampson | The OP is only requesting that two names be highlighted, max. That doesn't sound too bad. | |
| Sep 2, 2009 at 6:14 | comment | added | random | So much highlighting makes it way too busy/noisy. | |
| Sep 2, 2009 at 6:10 | comment | added | anon | I also notice the official answer to that other question is 'no, make a greasemonkey script" and I'd accept that for this question too. In my mind, my suggestion seems a bit more useful since I don't much care about what I said in comments, but I do like to understand the authors frame of reference for a given answer. | |
| Sep 2, 2009 at 6:05 | comment | added | anon | @random: that question asks that our own comments be highlighted, whereas mine is asking that there be highlighting for the user who left the answer. I sort of like the idea of highlighting your own comments, but it's a separate question. I think the benefit of answer-owner-highlighting is that you can more clearly understand the answerers intent, and can ignore superfluous comments from others if you wish. | |
| Sep 2, 2009 at 5:59 | comment | added | random | Dupe: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/16648/… | |
| Sep 2, 2009 at 5:26 | history | asked | anon | CC BY-SA 2.5 |