Timeline for How did this question get 5 upvotes and become an audit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Sep 9, 2013 at 10:45 | history | edited | Mat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:51 | comment | added | Grant Thomas | Where @psubsee2003 logic fails is that the title and body are different questions. It just so happens to worm Powershell in there, after the initial off-topic spiel. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:34 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @mehow not sure I follow the thin line of sarcasm, but do hope you learned a lesson... :-) | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:32 | comment | added | user221081 | @ShaWizDowArd i am proved wrong in this case. Now we can reverse from terrible to excellent and use the terrible as description of the reviewer -> | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:29 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=221081 by developer User.Id=50049 | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:28 | answer | added | psubsee2003 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:27 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @mehow on the contrary. You did try to close it, that's why you failed the audit. The question is on topic, so bottom line your review decision was wrong and the audits exist exactly for this purpose: make the reviewers stop and think before pulling the trigger. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:27 | comment | added | ben is uǝq backwards | If you thought it was not on-topic when it actually was, it is an excellent review audit. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:25 | comment | added | user221081 | @ShaWizDowArd I do now accept the fact that this question is on topic for SO (see psubsee 2nd comment). I have not voted to close it. I would have had before I realized the question was on topic for SO. My point here is that its a bad review audit. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:23 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:23 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @mehow I don't understand one thing... if you agree the question is on topic why did you vote to close it? | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:20 | comment | added | user221081 | @psubsee2003 shouldn't be taking me 15 minutes to research how to review one close vote. Bad audit is my point - I do accept that the question is ON topic. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:19 | comment | added | Bart | I would have failed it as well, but I think @psubsee2003 is correct. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:16 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | I think you off on this one. The wiki for powershell says it is a windows command prompt scripting environment. And historically scripting questions (like this, or bash) are on-topic. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:10 | history | edited | user221081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 305 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:07 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | Personally, I don't know enough about it to say one way or the other, but the contents of the answer certainly suggests it is at least on-topic. | |
| Sep 9, 2013 at 9:04 | history | asked | user221081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |