Timeline for Suggestion to reduce fake first-post reviews by adding minimum time to complete
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Sep 10, 2013 at 17:29 | comment | added | UpAndAdam | That makes infinitely more sense, and works more generically for all reviews, doesn't require blind stereotyping on times, and also gives a more direct path to correcting behavior. Thanks for the input Brad! I wasn't hard set on a 1 minute, obviously but even if you drop to 30 seconds or 10 seconds... you are always just moving a line which only slows automation down. | |
| Sep 10, 2013 at 17:27 | vote | accept | UpAndAdam | ||
| Sep 10, 2013 at 17:26 | vote | accept | UpAndAdam | ||
| Sep 10, 2013 at 17:27 | |||||
| Sep 10, 2013 at 17:17 | comment | added | Mark Amery |
Until reading your answer right now, I didn't know that there were problems with spam and other outright crap making it through the review queues. I gave up on everything but the suggested edit queue a long time ago, but after reading this post, I think I'll Skip through the other queues looking solely for really bad stuff to flag whenever I see items available to review.
|
|
| Sep 10, 2013 at 17:11 | history | answered | Brad LarsonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |