Timeline for Review Audit/Commenting on good questions discouraged?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 30, 2013 at 0:06 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Sep 30, 2013 at 0:06 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 22:41 | vote | accept | Matt Bryant | ||
| Sep 21, 2013 at 22:51 | answer | added | gnat | timeline score: 13 | |
| Sep 21, 2013 at 22:30 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | In this case, since there were answers, you should first have clicked through to the thread and checked whether your comment was covered by the existing answers. But in general I agree: it can be perfectly appropriate to leave a comment. And even in this specific case it would have been legitimate to read the whole thread, see that what you wanted to say in your comment wasn't covered, and go back to the review tab and leave your comment. | |
| S Sep 21, 2013 at 22:11 | history | bounty started | gnat | ||
| S Sep 21, 2013 at 22:11 | history | notice added | gnat | Draw attention | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 5:35 | history | edited | Matt Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added mention of ban
|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 5:29 | comment | added | John Dvorak | For now, I'd say: vote, then comment. Or: go to the page, and comment there. | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 4:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 12, 2013 at 6:36 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2013 at 4:34 | comment | added | Matt Bryant |
Not quite a duplicate. That question deals with someone who failed a bad review by clicking comment, and doesn't discuss the proper protocol for leaving comments.
|
|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 4:30 | comment | added | michaelb958--GoFundMonica | possible duplicate of Clicking "Add comment" fails review audit | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 | history | asked | Matt Bryant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |