Timeline for Are these suggested edits really worth rejecting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Sep 17, 2013 at 18:25 | comment | added | Diego C Nascimento | @minitech thanks, you are right, but I see all the time "How to", and I wanted to get the question not at a first user perspective. But I'm putting more attention to correcting/or not grammar when I'm unsure. | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 9:46 | comment | added | mmmmmm | @minitech - although in that case your edits might tend to be rejected as too minor as people see obvious to a native speaker grammar errors unfixed. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 22:53 | comment | added | Ry- Mod | The “editing grammar later” part is great, and I will do that. But if you think you don’t know English that well, it might be best to just avoid editing grammar altogether — it can give people an incentive to improve a post when they don’t have to start from an unnecessarily worse base (because that’s what improving does by default). | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 21:21 | history | edited | Diego C Nascimento | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 265 characters in body
|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:53 | comment | added | Diego C Nascimento | @Anders UP yes you get it right, its just about good classification of the questions. The question about SQL have down-votes by "no research" so it will be difficult to revert. Seems small grammar errors are why they are rejected (contrary to some reviews that know much here are not the best at English, as its not our primary language, and correct just a word) but ok, next time I skip these. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:52 | comment | added | mmmmmm | The second edit is not what I would call good grammar and so is no better than what was there. It needs a verb at least | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:42 | comment | added | user213634 |
Heh. The tag edit of question two was, in a sense, not too minor. The question specifically mentions MSSQL, but has attracted two Oracle style answers. But the question still is at -4, so for the edit to be worth your time you'd have to improve the question enough to revert that.
|
|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:36 | vote | accept | Diego C Nascimento | ||
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:33 | comment | added | Diego C Nascimento | @user814064 that's related to the question not to the answer. If is that I would change Windows XP Browsers, but they will be rejected from changing "to much" | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:30 | comment | added | dcaswell | I wouldn't have edited that tag unless you had proof that different sites are visible on the internet to different operating systems. There's absolutely no reason to think that Windows XP hides parts of the internet. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:26 | answer | added | user213634 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:18 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited. (its = possessive, it's = "it is" or "it has". See for example <http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Its-and-It's>.)
|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:17 | answer | added | jonsca | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:17 | answer | added | Servy | timeline score: 14 | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:16 | answer | added | Lance Roberts | timeline score: -1 | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:15 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:13 | history | asked | Diego C Nascimento | CC BY-SA 3.0 |