Timeline for Are these suggested edits really worth rejecting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:47 | comment | added | user213634 | @Servy I have an example for you, as I write in my answer, I rarely bother with edits, but tried again today. Would you have approved this: stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/2936370 (while editing another user came along and did the formatting, which I then decided not to change) so I stuck with grammar and wording. Would you have accepted or rejected this edit? | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:44 | comment | added | Servy | @DiegoCNascimento Both rejection reasons are appropriate, for reasons I stated. The reviewers picked one. The other might have been a bit better, but the one that they chose is not wrong. Your edit simply meets multiple rejection criteria. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:44 | comment | added | Servy | @DiegoCNascimento What? Did you mean "improve" rather than "review"? All of your edits will be reviews until you hit 2k rep. If you have other edits that you think are better examples then these then by all means link them here. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38 | comment | added | Diego C Nascimento | I said the "good ones", users are not even obligated to review. But then, its good to have a reject subject related to that. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:27 | comment | added | Servy | @DiegoCNascimento The reviewers are not obligated to fix your edit. If it were me, and I chose to improve the edit, I would almost certainly still reject it as it is still minor, and such a large portion of your edit is problematic. If you're suggesting an edit and the reviewer needs to put more time into fixing the post than you do then the edit should be rejected. A good edit should consume very little time on the part of the reviewer, even if a minor improvement needs to be made. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:25 | comment | added | Diego C Nascimento | If it introduces grammar problems the review could do its job and help by editing, or put the correct reject subject. This has occurred sometimes with good reviews. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:24 | history | edited | Servy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 117 characters in body
|
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:20 | comment | added | Servy | @DiegoCNascimento I didn't say that these tags were inappropriate, merely that, in this case, they aren't essential for the question; they're tangential tags, not "primary" tags. | |
| Sep 16, 2013 at 20:17 | history | answered | Servy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |