Timeline for Handling the close questions queue: weighted votes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 at 13:05 | comment | added | Ian | @Mołot: Ok, will do | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 11:46 | comment | added | Mołot | I just wanted to say that this particular point should be discussed in another question, one that already raised it and has some user input in it. Like this, or ask new one if nothing suits you. But that part is not directly related to OP's suggestion. | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 11:42 | comment | added | Ian | @Mołot: Yeah, I guess that's a good point. But ultimately StackOverflow works and Gamification and people's desire to help others are some of the main driving factors. Reviewing doesn't fit into either of these really, so there isn't much motivation to keep going. | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 11:23 | comment | added | Mołot | Rewarding reviews with rep was talked here already. AFAIR conclusion was: it would further encourage robo-reviews, and audits are pretty weak even now. | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 11:07 | history | answered | Ian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |