Timeline for Would you fail this close votes audit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 3, 2013 at 13:30 | history | edited | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 43 characters in body
|
Oct 3, 2013 at 12:49 | history | edited | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Oct 3, 2013 at 3:16 | history | edited | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Oct 3, 2013 at 3:03 | comment | added | Jamal | @RobertHarvey: I hate that, too. Clearly an indication that the user has not the basic idea what this website is for. It's like we're seen as a code hotline or something. | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 3:00 | comment | added | user102937 | @Jamal: Nobody's actually said that in a question to my knowledge, but they have said "you can email the codes to my.email@address". | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:58 | comment | added | Jamal | I'm looking forward to a user actually stating (un-ironically), "gimme dah codez." | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:57 | history | edited | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:56 | comment | added | user102937 | @Doorknob: In any case, that the audit asked you if the question should be closed as "Primarily Opinion-Based," was a clue that something was amiss. | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:56 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | @Robert - you'll be happy to know I had already upvoted that question :) | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:55 | comment | added | user102937 |
@AdamRackis: Have a look at my icanhazcodez question here: stackoverflow.com/q/11660127
|
|
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:54 | comment | added | Josh Crozier | @AdamRackis I guess not.. unfortunately it seems as though many questions are like that - from what I have seen lately anyways.. | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:52 | vote | accept | Doorknob | ||
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:52 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | Isn't this a plain and simple "gimme dah codez" question? Aren't those always off topic? | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:52 | comment | added | Doorknob | Ah, thanks very much for the clarification. I initially disagreed with the whole "embrace the non-Googlers" thing, but now I see your point. | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 2:50 | history | answered | user102937 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |