Timeline for Question edit was attributed to another user
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Oct 8, 2013 at 5:16 | comment | added | Praveen | @ile You don't need to get frustrated, As I already mentioned the user with 2000rep does not get any rep for editing other posts. FYI: stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/edit. Actually both the edits are invalid according to community, since the user had (2000+ rep) this will not come under REVIEW category(will be placed directly). Hope you understand. Continue your GOOD WORK and make STACK EXCHANGE a better site. Good luck. | |
| Oct 8, 2013 at 5:08 | comment | added | ile | oops, @user1671639 - that's the exact same question, thanks. On a side note, I understand but I still feel frustrated that for spending 10 minutes editing a post I got auto-rejected and another user gets credit as a result. | |
| Oct 8, 2013 at 4:59 | comment | added | Praveen | @ile I don't think it has bug. However sometimes happens which is fully depends on the reviewer. Since the user has the privilege to Edit Questions And Answers it has been moved on to his name. Also take a look at this meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185599/… | |
| Oct 8, 2013 at 4:51 | history | edited | Praveen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Oct 8, 2013 at 4:49 | comment | added | ile |
The other user's edit was to change Also, here's the structure of the tables: to The structure of the tables:. The more important edits were untouched and the edit was then posted under the other user. I still think this is a wrong.
|
|
| Oct 8, 2013 at 4:45 | history | answered | Praveen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |