Return to Question

Today my answer was edited and a link from cplusplus.com was changed to cppreference.com. The edit comment was "use better reference".

I read this answer, which was provided by the editor.

The problem is that the word "better" is extremely relative. Better for someone is worse for another. I absolutely don't care about cppreference.com and cplusplus.com, but changing links to another website, just because you prefer that one, is wrong. I don't think one is better than the other, but I edited it back to cplusplus. People, don't try to push your opinions onto others.

Imagine cplusplus.com is my favorite cpp reference. Why would anybody edit the link to another reference?

Today my answer was edited and a link from cplusplus.com was changed to cppreference.com. The edit comment was "use better reference".

I read this answer, which was provided by the editor.

The problem is that the word "better" is extremely relative. Better for someone is worse for another. I absolutely don't care about cppreference.com and cplusplus.com, but changing links to another website, just because you prefer that one, is wrong. I don't think one is better than the other, but I edited it back to cplusplus. People, don't try to push your opinions onto others.

Imagine cplusplus.com is my favorite cpp reference. Why would anybody edit the link to another reference?

Today my answer was edited and a link from cplusplus.com was changed to cppreference.com. The edit comment was "use better reference".

I read this answer, which was provided by the editor.

The problem is that the word "better" is extremely relative. Better for someone is worse for another. I absolutely don't care about cppreference.com and cplusplus.com, but changing links to another website, just because you prefer that one, is wrong. I don't think one is better than the other, but I edited it back to cplusplus. People, don't try to push your opinions onto others.

Imagine cplusplus.com is my favorite cpp reference. Why would anybody edit the link to another reference?

Today my answer was edited and a link from cplusplus.com was changed to cppreference.com. The edit comment was "use better reference".

I read this answer, which was provided by the editor.

The problem is that the word "better" is extremely relative. Better for someone is worse for another. I absolutely don't care about cppreference.com and cplusplus.com, but changing links to another website, just because you prefer that one, is wrong. I don't think one is better than the other, but I edited it back to cplusplus. People, don't try to push your opinions onto others.

Imagine cplusplus.com is my favorite cpp reference. Why would anybody edit the link to another reference?

Today my answer was edited and a link from cplusplus.com was changed to cppreference.com. The edit comment was "use better reference".

I read this answer, which was provided by the editor.

The problem is that the word "better" is extremely relative. Better for someone is worse for an other. I absolutely don't care about cppreference.com and cplusplus.com, but changing links to an other website, just because you prefer that one is wrong. I don't think one is better than the other, but I edited it back to cplusplus. People, don't try to push your opinions onto others.

Imagine cplusplus.com is my favorite cpp reference. Why would anybody edit the link to another reference?

Today my answer was edited and a link from cplusplus.com was changed to cppreference.com. The edit comment was "use better reference".

I read this answer, which was provided by the editor.

The problem is that the word "better" is extremely relative. Better for someone is worse for another. I absolutely don't care about cppreference.com and cplusplus.com, but changing links to another website, just because you prefer that one, is wrong. I don't think one is better than the other, but I edited it back to cplusplus. People, don't try to push your opinions onto others.

Imagine cplusplus.com is my favorite cpp reference. Why would anybody edit the link to another reference?