Timeline for Is there a different standard for Christianity.SE?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:48 | vote | accept | Gaia | ||
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:48 | vote | accept | Gaia | ||
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:48 | |||||
| Dec 26, 2018 at 14:30 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Nov 23, 2018 at 4:17 | answer | added | Jesse | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 12, 2013 at 4:18 | answer | added | Peter Turner | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 7:38 | comment | added | Mołot | "Can I believe in evolution and still be a Christian?" can be objectively answered basing on catechism or other rule sets of given Christian group. There are official docs on it. "Poor" cannot be treated that way. Best you can get is "officially encouraged / discouraged / outdated by this API docs", but that does not say if they are really good or not, either. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 5:22 | answer | added | jmac | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 5:15 | vote | accept | Gaia | ||
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:48 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2013 at 5:12 | comment | added | Gaia | THIS is my main point: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/200352/…. but if I asked that right away, with only 300 points, people would go to town on me. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 5:11 | answer | added | Shog9Mod | timeline score: 17 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 5:11 | comment | added | Gaia | You got a point, @JonEricson. But isn't the answer to your question above already a big huge, 50+ downvoted NO? | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 5:03 | comment | added | Jon Ericson StaffMod | This really ought be asked on Christianity's meta. Unless the question you are really asking is "Should opinion based answers be allowed on Stack Overflow?" In which case, the question isn't very clear at all. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:54 | answer | added | Jon EricsonStaffMod | timeline score: 19 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:54 | history | edited | Gaia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:40 | answer | added | Ward - Trying Codidact | timeline score: 10 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:39 | comment | added | Gaia | changed the question. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:39 | history | edited | Gaia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed example non constructive question
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:39 | comment | added | BoltClock's a Unicorn Mod | Also christianity.stackexchange.com/about christianity.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:37 | comment | added | Gaia | ok, let me change the example. even though "interpretations" ARE essentially "opinions". | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:37 | comment | added | BoltClock's a Unicorn Mod | That SO question blatantly asks "what's your opinion?" with no regard for factual accounts whatsoever. Biblical exegesis is... something completely different. I don't think this is a good comparison. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:29 | history | asked | Gaia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |