Timeline for Correlation between Good Questions and Good Answers (research post)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 18, 2021 at 11:52 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
Dec 9, 2013 at 15:32 | comment | added | Brad Larson Mod | While they control for only the answers that come in during the first 24 hours, it's unclear to me if they also only account for votes that come in during that first period. The data dumps generally don't make that easy to extract, and I know that question and answer voting has a very long tail. If they're not accounting for that, the question and answers scores from older questions will skew these results. | |
Dec 9, 2013 at 15:30 | comment | added | Brad Larson Mod | "For instance, if we simply predict everything as low quality, we would get a high prediction accuracy." | |
Dec 9, 2013 at 8:14 | comment | added | Mołot | Higer-scored question does not mean it's better. To get some quality comparison, you should compare it to the average and standard deviation of it's tag, at least. There are SE sites for math and for statistics, right? So there you can get details, but naked vote count is a poor measurement. Also, they tend to ignore the fact that vote count depends also on the SEO position of a question, both in internal and external search. "Ask a popular question to get a popular answer" could be a title of this just as well. | |
Dec 9, 2013 at 6:52 | comment | added | Mat | Wow. "Quality" based only on post scores... | |
Dec 9, 2013 at 6:35 | history | asked | Hooked | CC BY-SA 3.0 |