Timeline for Can we improve the way edits are working
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Dec 13, 2013 at 6:07 | history | edited | tshepang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:58 | answer | added | Shadow Wizard | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:55 | comment | added | Matthias | @wooble thanks this covers it then very well. So the risk remains then only for the time man edit is open. Quite acceptable then. | |
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:42 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 12, 2013 at 18:50 | |||||
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:32 | comment | added | Wooble | @Matthias: if the 2k+ user starts editing before you submit your suggestion, they'll never see any indication it exists at all. They can't start after you suggest it; they'll be taken to the Review screen instead of being allowed to edit. | |
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:26 | comment | added | Matthias | @Yannis Hmm, must have been a 15min race condition :) But does this indicator also give the option to the 2k+ user to verify /adopt that edit or is it just an indicator that a pending edit exists? | |
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:22 | comment | added | yannis | Hm, what you suggest already exists, there is an indicator for pending edits, and 2K+ users can improve the suggested edit if they wish. Perhaps you fell victim to a race condition? | |
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:21 | comment | added | Bala | check this meta.stackexchange.com/questions/184992/… | |
Dec 12, 2013 at 12:20 | history | asked | Matthias | CC BY-SA 3.0 |