Timeline for "That's not what the comments are for"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2013 at 15:54 | vote | accept | John Saunders | ||
| Dec 28, 2013 at 15:54 | |||||
| Dec 27, 2013 at 23:37 | comment | added | brasofilo | @TheGrinch, I don't. I expect self-cleanup or a janitor's one. Point being comments can be meta and that's ok ;) | |
| Dec 27, 2013 at 23:33 | comment | added | user102937 | @brasofilo: That's fine. Just don't expect such discussions to be a part of the permanent record; they tend to get deleted once their purpose is served. | |
| Dec 27, 2013 at 23:32 | comment | added | brasofilo | @TheGrinch, there are ocasions when we need a small meta discussion with the OP, an editor or comenteer. And it's not worthy to make it Full Meta(l Jacket). | |
| Dec 27, 2013 at 21:22 | comment | added | user102937 | They are for post clarification. I'd say this falls within that realm, even though it's somewhat meta. | |
| Dec 27, 2013 at 20:55 | history | edited | OdedStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2013 at 20:49 | history | answered | OdedStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |