Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out

Here are some questions that I think are good usage of

  1. Loop through an array in JavaScriptLoop through an array in JavaScript
  2. Why is using "for...in" for array iteration a bad idea?Why is using "for...in" for array iteration a bad idea?

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out

Here are some questions that I think are good usage of

  1. Loop through an array in JavaScript
  2. Why is using "for...in" for array iteration a bad idea?

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out

Here are some questions that I think are good usage of

  1. Loop through an array in JavaScript
  2. Why is using "for...in" for array iteration a bad idea?
added 263 characters in body
Source Link
scrblnrd3
  • 6.9k
  • 3
  • 26
  • 46

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out

Here are some questions that I think are good usage of

  1. Loop through an array in JavaScript
  2. Why is using "for...in" for array iteration a bad idea?

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out

Here are some questions that I think are good usage of

  1. Loop through an array in JavaScript
  2. Why is using "for...in" for array iteration a bad idea?
Source Link
scrblnrd3
  • 6.9k
  • 3
  • 26
  • 46

I don't think eliminating those is a good idea; some questions deal directly with the for loop, such as questions about expanding a for(a;b;c){d} into a while() loop.

The same thing applies with forms. There are questions that deal directly with forms, so the form tag is very applicable there. However, if you see questions with a for loop that have a edited in, reject the edit, roll it back, or edit the tags out