Timeline for Why is the close review queue lagging behind the other queues on certain sites?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2021 at 14:44 | history | edited | bad_coder | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Ease of reading edit. Organized links into list. Added source fence with language code.
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jan 2, 2014 at 14:44 | answer | added | Aditya | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Jan 2, 2014 at 14:19 | history | suggested | Aditya | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
ah... it's 2014 already.. HAPPY NEW YEAR.. also edited to clear the confusion that it is January that we are talking about
|
| Jan 2, 2014 at 14:17 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 2, 2014 at 14:19 | |||||
| Jan 2, 2014 at 14:07 | answer | added | user194162 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 11:14 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @OGHaza That's a good point about close vs the other queues. It doesn't completely apply to beta sites, where FP/LA comes at 350 rep, close/reopen at 500 rep and LQ (which requires 6 votes) at 1000 rep. But close is a lot more common than reopen or LQ. But why are some sites immune? AU or SU don't suffer from a lack of community participation, and neither does CS except when it comes to closing (the close review queue on CS only has 6 regulars, which does make things a bit tight). | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 10:16 | comment | added | OGHaza | tbh I think the answer to this question is as simple as: because it takes 5 close votes to remove a question from the queue and because it is the queue with the highest rep requirement. | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 9:42 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarify in the title that this is close/other queues, not SO/rest of the world; cite an earlier related meta question
|
| Jan 2, 2014 at 6:06 | answer | added | D.W. | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 3:09 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @hichris123 It's a lot on the scale of the site. The absolute figure is completely irrelevant. My point here is to compare in relative terms. Obviously most sites don't even have 100k posts total. I do know that CS is struggling to keep up (I'm a mod there), even if the numbers are of course tiny on an absolute scale. | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 3:09 | comment | added | hichris123 | Also, see this answer for more information about the oldest pending dates, etc. (data as of some date in December. | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 3:02 | comment | added | hichris123 | You do realize 300 (on SU) is nothing compared to everything else, and the rest of the sites are < 100 for the most part. That's not too much. There's a backlog, but it's nothing in comparison to SO. | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 2:51 | history | asked | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |