Timeline for Can't address this user in a comment [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 14:35 | comment | added | TRiG | It's stupid because it's confusing. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 14:09 | comment | added | Devolus | @TRiGisTimothyRichardGreen, don't see why this is stupuid. If there is only one poster involved, then it makes sense. Might be overkill to adress this special case but it doesn't hurt either. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 14:08 | comment | added | TRiG | This is a stupid design decision by our SE overlords, but they stick their fingers in their ears and sing when we complain to them, so STATUS-BY-INEPT-DESIGN. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 12:16 | history | closed |
Himanshu Richard Tingle Shadow Wizard Antony Aziz Shaikh |
Duplicate of How do comment @replies work?, Eeeeek - what happened to my @ salutation? | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 8, 2014 at 12:16 | |||||
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:18 | history | edited | Richard Tingle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor spelling
|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:14 | answer | added | Richard Tingle | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:11 | comment | added | Devolus | Oh! I was confusing it with another user, otherwise I wouldn't have used the address anyway. OK, I didn't know that the addressing will dissapear in that case as I never had seen this before. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:10 | comment | added | PeterJ | It's because nobody else is involved in the comments, so it will go to him (only) anyway. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 11:09 | history | asked | Devolus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |