Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

See also About unnecessary tags and the minor edits adding themAbout unnecessary tags and the minor edits adding them for my list of low-quality tags.

*See Troyen's commentTroyen's comment for a downside to this suggestion for the smaller SE sites

As far as I could see, there's no option to flag tag wikis (I'd guess because they have to get approved by 5000+ rep users in the first place). I do think it would be useful to be able to flag these, so that we don't have to create list-your-bad-tags postslist-your-bad-tags posts on meta.

What I think is that perhaps if there are some audits that simulate edits adding very minor tags, such as the ones listed herelisted here, these extra audits would help the reviewers spot these minor edits more often, and therefore prevent these kinds of minor edits from being accepted so often.

Short on rep? Find 1000 questions, no matter how old they are, and enrich them with some bullshit tag like image or div. Get them rubber-stamped by three reviewers and enjoy your free rep! —Pëkka's bounty message on this questionPëkka's bounty message on this question

*See Charles' reply to thisCharles' reply to this for the better alternative.

See also About unnecessary tags and the minor edits adding them for my list of low-quality tags.

*See Troyen's comment for a downside to this suggestion for the smaller SE sites

As far as I could see, there's no option to flag tag wikis (I'd guess because they have to get approved by 5000+ rep users in the first place). I do think it would be useful to be able to flag these, so that we don't have to create list-your-bad-tags posts on meta.

What I think is that perhaps if there are some audits that simulate edits adding very minor tags, such as the ones listed here, these extra audits would help the reviewers spot these minor edits more often, and therefore prevent these kinds of minor edits from being accepted so often.

Short on rep? Find 1000 questions, no matter how old they are, and enrich them with some bullshit tag like image or div. Get them rubber-stamped by three reviewers and enjoy your free rep! —Pëkka's bounty message on this question

*See Charles' reply to this for the better alternative.

See also About unnecessary tags and the minor edits adding them for my list of low-quality tags.

*See Troyen's comment for a downside to this suggestion for the smaller SE sites

As far as I could see, there's no option to flag tag wikis (I'd guess because they have to get approved by 5000+ rep users in the first place). I do think it would be useful to be able to flag these, so that we don't have to create list-your-bad-tags posts on meta.

What I think is that perhaps if there are some audits that simulate edits adding very minor tags, such as the ones listed here, these extra audits would help the reviewers spot these minor edits more often, and therefore prevent these kinds of minor edits from being accepted so often.

Short on rep? Find 1000 questions, no matter how old they are, and enrich them with some bullshit tag like image or div. Get them rubber-stamped by three reviewers and enjoy your free rep! —Pëkka's bounty message on this question

*See Charles' reply to this for the better alternative.

replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I am aware that the bounty on this question is looking for sources, and I only have oneonly have one, but I think this might be useful to share anyway. I am not sure about if these are good enough suggestions to be feature-requests on their own though.

I am aware that the bounty on this question is looking for sources, and I only have one, but I think this might be useful to share anyway. I am not sure about if these are good enough suggestions to be feature-requests on their own though.

I am aware that the bounty on this question is looking for sources, and I only have one, but I think this might be useful to share anyway. I am not sure about if these are good enough suggestions to be feature-requests on their own though.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

See also http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/218540/246052About unnecessary tags and the minor edits adding them for my list of low-quality tags.

*See Troyen's commentTroyen's comment for a downside to this suggestion for the smaller SE sites

As far as I could see, there's no option to flag tag wikis (I'd guess because they have to get approved by 5000+ rep users in the first place). I do think it would be useful to be able to flag these, so that we don't have to create list-your-bad-tags postslist-your-bad-tags posts on meta.

What I think is that perhaps if there are some audits that simulate edits adding very minor tags, such as the ones listed herelisted here, these extra audits would help the reviewers spot these minor edits more often, and therefore prevent these kinds of minor edits from being accepted so often.

Short on rep? Find 1000 questions, no matter how old they are, and enrich them with some bullshit tag like image or div. Get them rubber-stamped by three reviewers and enjoy your free rep! —Pëkka's bounty message on this questionPëkka's bounty message on this question

*See Charles' reply to thisCharles' reply to this for the better alternative.

See also http://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/218540/246052 for my list of low-quality tags.

*See Troyen's comment for a downside to this suggestion for the smaller SE sites

As far as I could see, there's no option to flag tag wikis (I'd guess because they have to get approved by 5000+ rep users in the first place). I do think it would be useful to be able to flag these, so that we don't have to create list-your-bad-tags posts on meta.

What I think is that perhaps if there are some audits that simulate edits adding very minor tags, such as the ones listed here, these extra audits would help the reviewers spot these minor edits more often, and therefore prevent these kinds of minor edits from being accepted so often.

Short on rep? Find 1000 questions, no matter how old they are, and enrich them with some bullshit tag like image or div. Get them rubber-stamped by three reviewers and enjoy your free rep! —Pëkka's bounty message on this question

*See Charles' reply to this for the better alternative.

See also About unnecessary tags and the minor edits adding them for my list of low-quality tags.

*See Troyen's comment for a downside to this suggestion for the smaller SE sites

As far as I could see, there's no option to flag tag wikis (I'd guess because they have to get approved by 5000+ rep users in the first place). I do think it would be useful to be able to flag these, so that we don't have to create list-your-bad-tags posts on meta.

What I think is that perhaps if there are some audits that simulate edits adding very minor tags, such as the ones listed here, these extra audits would help the reviewers spot these minor edits more often, and therefore prevent these kinds of minor edits from being accepted so often.

Short on rep? Find 1000 questions, no matter how old they are, and enrich them with some bullshit tag like image or div. Get them rubber-stamped by three reviewers and enjoy your free rep! —Pëkka's bounty message on this question

*See Charles' reply to this for the better alternative.

Bounty Ended with 500 reputation awarded by Pekka
added 131 characters in body
Source Link
joeytje50
  • 919
  • 4
  • 10
Loading
added in link to Troyen's comment
Source Link
joeytje50
  • 919
  • 4
  • 10
Loading
added 634 characters in body
Source Link
joeytje50
  • 919
  • 4
  • 10
Loading
Added another idea. Perhaps this helps.
Source Link
joeytje50
  • 919
  • 4
  • 10
Loading
Source Link
joeytje50
  • 919
  • 4
  • 10
Loading