Timeline for Suggested edit system only rewards
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 19:52 | comment | added | starball | Related: Is there a penalty for one's edit suggestion being rejected? | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 18:33 | vote | accept | Jason Sturges | ||
| Feb 27, 2014 at 17:00 | comment | added | Joe W | Why? Would you also put in a penalty for a bad edit that was done by someone who has the edit privilege? What about flagging, close votes, and other actions that gain badge rewards? | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 16:38 | history | edited | Jason Sturges | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed to discussion, added clarify to compromised checks and balances.
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 12:34 | answer | added | user221081 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 11:36 | comment | added | BoltClock's a Unicorn Mod |
Also related: Reject an already-approved suggested edit when rolling it back
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 11:30 | answer | added | Revious | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 10:28 | answer | added | psubsee2003 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:44 | comment | added | Jason Sturges | There's also anonymous users; however, those users have less incentive to gain reputation and badges. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:41 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | @Charles there are other race conditions that result in a rejected edit by Commnunity, it is not only cases where an edit was improved. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:38 | comment | added | devnull | Maybe review bans should be accompanied by reversal of reputation gain from suggested edits. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:33 | comment | added | Charles | @VishwasSharma, when that happens, it's because the person doing the review selected "Improve" to continue editing, and then unchecked the "this was helpful" checkbox, which causes the edit to be rejected automatically. It's still a rejection, even if it appeared to come from Community instead. Anyone trying to edit a post with a pending edit is forced to try to review the edit. There can be edit conflicts, but those are rare, and the proposed rep penalty should not apply when a conflicted edit gets squished. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:21 | comment | added | DroidDev | @RobertLongson shouldn't this be added to question? | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:17 | comment | added | Robert Longson | Rejections by Community could be excluded from this. >2k gets no reward so getting no punishment either would seem consistent. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:14 | comment | added | DroidDev |
Once, my suggested edit was rejected by Community moderator automatically, because, while my edit was in review queue, a >2ker edited the post, without even going to review queue. I think in these cases, editors will be punished for nothing and also how are you going to punish those >2kers, who don't have to go to review queue???
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 9:07 | comment | added | CRABOLO | I like the idea of suggested editor getting -1 for rejected edit. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 8:59 | comment | added | doppelgreener | Related: Suggested edit system is causing grief, needs to be rethought | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 8:54 | history | asked | Jason Sturges | CC BY-SA 3.0 |