Timeline for Question only has 3 close votes in review queue
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Dec 21, 2014 at 6:52 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 21, 2014 at 18:56 | |||||
| Feb 27, 2014 at 16:23 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
quote background for screen shot
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 15:52 | vote | accept | CRABOLO | ||
| Feb 27, 2014 at 15:38 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | @Wooble is correct here: that particular question had 3 votes and 2 flags on it when Lower saw it. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 15:17 | history | edited | Martijn Pieters |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 15:14 | answer | added | Martijn Pieters | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 15:03 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | The queue is being cleared in batches, until all batches have completed you'll still see those questions in the queue. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 15:02 | history | edited | CRABOLO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 50 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:47 | comment | added | Servy | @JonClements It does, but the "show only questions with 4 close votes" shouldn't take flags into account. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:47 | comment | added | Wooble | Shog9's proposal that was implemented did mention both close flags and close votes (and, in fact, showed that setting the threshold at 8 would have had 1 question in the queue). | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:46 | comment | added | Jon Clements | I've never really thought about it too much, but does that summary bar also take into account flags that people have that relate to close reasons... That could account for the off-topic? @Servy? | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:46 | comment | added | Servy | @LowerClassOverflowian Then perhaps the oldest vote aged out. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:45 | comment | added | Jon Clements | @LowerClassOverflowian from the sounds of it - it has three current close votes... The fourth looks to be an older off-topic reason | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:44 | history | edited | CRABOLO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 213 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:44 | history | edited | OdedStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:43 | comment | added | rene Mod | @Servy I was ninja editing that comment but yes, that is it :-) | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:43 | comment | added | Servy | @rene And the reason it doesn't show up on the dialog is that it's using one of the old reasons that has since been removed. The vote is still there, it just doesn't have anywhere to show it on the dialog. | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:41 | comment | added | rene Mod | It has an off-topic vote but that is only shown if you go to the detail dialog of off-topic, if the off-topic reason is still an available option. (you won't see votes for Not a real question ) | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:40 | comment | added | Jon Clements | Why does the box up the top show "Should this question be closed as: too broad or off-topic"? (emphasis mine) - is there a "hidden" off-topic vote? | |
| Feb 27, 2014 at 14:39 | history | asked | CRABOLO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |