Skip to main content
39 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 29, 2019 at 22:41 comment added Braiam This is relevant again because GoT?
Apr 29, 2019 at 21:36 history edited Nobilis CC BY-SA 4.0
added 80 characters in body
Apr 29, 2019 at 20:20 comment added Peter Vandivier @mjeppesen you can block the HNQ here int the Sidebar section. Just tested it now and it blocks the HNQ for all sites (even ones you're not a member of). Then you just have to remember to not use the mobile app (got the last scene of GoT 8x03 spoiled for me this morning despite a self-imposed Twitter and FB moratorium 😰)
Mar 13, 2019 at 11:14 comment added Nobilis @Edlothiad Just because you don't have a problem with it, it doesn't mean that other people don't either. Saying "deal with it" is very unhelpful and clearly whatever policies are in place haven't managed to deter people from posting spoilers in the titles (otherwise this question wouldn't have been receiving attention and upvotes more than 5 years on from its publication). Why should ordinary users be made to accommodate the irresponsible ones?
Mar 13, 2019 at 9:46 comment added Edlothiad @JoelBerkeley Maybe that hasn't come up in my read through of my python tutorial. What a spoiler that would be, maybe it's so overwhelming it puts me off my python learning experience and I give up. It's all subjective. I for one find spoilers tend to have a beneficial effect on my experience, especially the minor kind we get on our sites. The users work extremely hard to keep the content as clean as possible. If you're afraid of being spoiled either figure out how to hide the HNQ for a couple of days, or watch the film/episode. Or as an alternative, just be a mature adult about it.
Mar 12, 2019 at 20:24 comment added joel @Edlothiad because knowing that some person on the internet wants to flatten their list of lists in python doesn't ruin anyone's coding experience. The equivalent can't be said of films
S May 18, 2018 at 20:53 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S May 18, 2018 at 20:53 history notice removed CommunityBot
May 11, 2018 at 16:18 answer added gnat timeline score: 1
S May 10, 2018 at 19:38 history bounty started Jeremy
S May 10, 2018 at 19:38 history notice added Jeremy Draw attention
May 10, 2018 at 18:00 answer added gbjbaanb timeline score: -2
Jan 23, 2018 at 11:36 comment added Edlothiad It's not a matter of "is it easy to ban the questions". It's a matter of "Why should our (SFF/M&TV/whatever) questions be denied the HNQ when others aren't"
Jan 4, 2018 at 19:37 answer added rgettman timeline score: -1
Jan 4, 2018 at 16:48 answer added GeneralMike timeline score: 2
Jan 4, 2018 at 16:40 answer added GeneralMike timeline score: 0
Jan 3, 2018 at 9:34 history edited Nobilis CC BY-SA 3.0
added 97 characters in body
Aug 30, 2017 at 11:58 answer added Rand al'Thor timeline score: 7
Aug 30, 2017 at 11:53 answer added Helmar timeline score: 5
Aug 29, 2017 at 16:03 answer added Stevoisiak timeline score: 1
Aug 29, 2017 at 15:23 answer added Jorn timeline score: -4
Aug 24, 2017 at 12:32 history edited Nobilis CC BY-SA 3.0
added 254 characters in body
Aug 24, 2017 at 5:34 comment added mjeppesen @RockPaperLizard how did you block the Hot Network Questions area?
May 11, 2016 at 21:26 comment added Amazon Dies In Darkness Because of the frequent spoilers from the Movies & TV Shows SE, I have had to block the entire Hot Network Questions area. This, of course, reduces hits for StackExchange, which is not in their best interest. It also means I don't provide answers to (or votes on) any of the Hot Network Questions those questions, as I don't see them.
May 28, 2015 at 5:48 answer added Christian Rau timeline score: 13
May 28, 2015 at 3:27 answer added Monica Cellio timeline score: 7
May 27, 2015 at 20:27 comment added Nobilis @Jaydles Hahaha, duly noted (and action taken).
May 27, 2015 at 20:27 history edited Nobilis CC BY-SA 3.0
added 50 characters in body
May 27, 2015 at 18:08 comment added Jaydles Staff So, um... this question about preventing spoilers has spoilers in hidden sections, but with no indiction of what they might spoil, making it impossible to know if one should avoid highlighting them. :P
May 27, 2015 at 15:11 history edited Robert Cartaino
edited tags
May 5, 2015 at 17:35 comment added usr Right now there are a lot of hard spoilers giving away information about the Avengers. See Spoilers in the sidebar are annoying which was (legitimately) closed as a dupe of this one.
May 4, 2015 at 15:06 comment added Christian Rau The sites you're talking about definitely have a working and applied "no spoilers in titles policy", though. So I have a hard time seeing the actual problem you're trying to solve here. Of course this doesn't prevent users from writing spoiling titles occasionally, but this just happens and usually people jump in and improve the title.
Jun 20, 2014 at 14:37 comment added RomanSt Seriously, this sucks. Please make it stop. "Why did X kill Y" can trivially destroy a season finale - all the while I'm just reading about Android's Dalvik cache.
Mar 4, 2014 at 16:34 comment added Travis J I like the idea of editing the spoiler out of the title. I don't think there should be any markup though. For example: What were Cypher's motives with regards to Morpheus?
Mar 4, 2014 at 16:32 comment added Bill the Lizard I think spoilers would be a meta tag. It doesn't tell you what the question is about, but instead tells you some attribute of the question itself. It feels similar to the now deleted homework and subjective tags on Stack Overflow.
Mar 4, 2014 at 16:13 comment added Nobilis @LowerClassOverflowian I understand but beg to differ. People here have worked very hard to make sure that questions and answers are rigorously formatted and tagged. I don't see why this should be any different for questions that contain spoilers.
Mar 4, 2014 at 16:12 comment added Nobilis @BilltheLizard Earlier I noticed a question with a major spoiler for The Matrix in the title and after checking it out it seems that it's not an issue on that network (I've seen the movie so that one wasn't a big deal but it could have applied to a movie I hadn't seen). I think a simple rule like that could also work out but I'm not aware of such a policy.
Mar 4, 2014 at 16:09 comment added Bill the Lizard Is there a Hot Questions list somewhere that displays more than the title? If not, I think a courtesy "no spoilers in titles" rule (enforced through editing) should be sufficient.
Mar 4, 2014 at 16:03 history asked Nobilis CC BY-SA 3.0