Timeline for Do related linked questions really need to be linked twice?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2022 at 23:55 | comment | added | V2Blast StaffMod | A related bug report, marked as [status-bydesign]: Linked and Related sections contain duplicate links to questions. There's also a related feature request to change this behavior: Remove post from the related list if it's in the linked list already | |
| Oct 23, 2022 at 23:50 | history | edited | V2BlastStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| S Jul 28, 2017 at 8:53 | history | suggested | trichoplax is on Codidact now | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Make slightly more explicit that the duplication is in the sidebar, not between the post and the sidebar.
|
| Jul 28, 2017 at 8:38 | answer | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 8:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 28, 2017 at 8:53 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2017 at 8:30 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | I think excluding linked items from the related list would leave more room for more related items (I expect in many cases there are more related items than can be shown in a short list). | |
| Mar 15, 2014 at 21:27 | comment | added | user102937 | I think excluding linked items from the related list would just make things more confusing. | |
| Mar 15, 2014 at 21:26 | comment | added | OJFord | On the contrary I would argue it makes the question more related. But this doesn't mean it needs to be listed twice. | |
| Mar 15, 2014 at 21:15 | comment | added | user102937 | The "related" question list is built first. Sometimes questions that happen to be related also get "linked" buy other community members. Linking a question doesn't make it any less related. | |
| Mar 15, 2014 at 20:52 | history | asked | OJFord | CC BY-SA 3.0 |