Timeline for Showing votes on review audit questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 18, 2014 at 16:53 | vote | accept | Amicable | ||
Mar 18, 2014 at 16:11 | answer | added | Geoff Dalgas | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 16:07 | history | edited | Geoff Dalgas |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:13 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Amicable maybe, but there is also a user script that when installed will show you big alert "this is an audit". The dev team did not ban it and appears to be fine with it, so that's all the proof we need for my above point. If you care enough to do those tricks, you're not likely doing reviews just for badges. | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:11 | comment | added | Amicable | @Shadow Not saying it's a game breaker but this just feels especially easy. If I was trying to spam through the reviews just to get a badge, I could easily just click the vote number for each question - it wouldn't even take a second. | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:09 | comment | added | user | Related discussion here: In the review queue, audits should only fail (or pass) you once you actually would take action | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:08 | history | edited | Amicable | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added freehand circles
|
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:05 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Audits are easy to cheat, by design. If one can spend that extra few seconds it means he's most likely not a robo reviewer anyway. | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:03 | history | asked | Amicable | CC BY-SA 3.0 |