Timeline for The profile page is getting a makeover (Part One)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 at 2:52 | comment | added | jmac | @Shog9 ♦ - Reputation 196,772 - Active in: Meta Answers, Chat, Snarkiness. Meta Answers: 9.5/10 (top 0.01% of users), Chat: 0.34 starred messages/hour logged in (top 27% of users), Snarkiness: 11/10 (it goes up to 11). Add infographics or sparklines for impact. Fully agreed. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 18:08 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | I'm much more in favor of task-specific metrics here. If someone asks a lot of questions, tell me how good they are at asking questions; if someone posts a lot of answers, tell me how good they are at answering. Ditto for edits, reviews, whatever - I want to know what you do here and how well you do it, not some generic "participant" level. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 1:04 | comment | added | asheeshr | This suggestion is similar to Jeff's good citizenship metric. That discussion didnt really go anywhere, not that the idea is bad, just that the type of user participation we see is far too variable ranging from lurkers, voters, editors and askers/answerers with many users staying squarely within a certain class of participation which is as valuable as someone who does all of the above. | |
| Mar 21, 2014 at 0:25 | comment | added | user98085 | Oh god, no. Let's not pretend we have an all-encompassing empirical formula for what constitutes an "active" user. That'll just lead to people looking for holes in the system to exploit, not to mention the very same harassment as with the accepted rate. | |
| Mar 20, 2014 at 23:37 | history | answered | juergen d | CC BY-SA 3.0 |