Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 22, 2014 at 8:30 comment added gnat @Amicable not (yet), it would take a bit of time and effort to build a compelling motivation part for this feature. I would like to, but can't tell when I have enough time for this. If you could do this instead, I would appreciate
May 22, 2014 at 8:18 comment added Amicable @gnat do you want to go ahead and post this as a separate feature request?
May 22, 2014 at 8:18 vote accept Amicable
May 21, 2014 at 22:06 comment added gnat @mhlester I overreacted because I still remember that pain when I discovered that I need to vote on like 100 or 200 more questions for my first Electorate, it was quite a... discovery and it helped me remember that math and wording very well. Of course, later on, I realized how helpful this push was (I love voting on questions now) but that old pain is really hard to forget :)
May 21, 2014 at 22:03 history edited gnat CC BY-SA 3.0
clarification copied into post from comments
May 21, 2014 at 22:01 comment added mhlester Gah! You are absolutely right. I misread. Now that I realize that I do fully support this and think this is a great idea. My apologies! Vote locked unless you edit the post, at which point you've got my +1
May 21, 2014 at 21:57 comment added gnat @mhlester as far as I know "no less than 25%" means opposite: "fewer than 25%" skips would mean no badge. I learned that wording and associated math from Electorate badge, and I am about 200% certain that I know what it means and how it works. If you want to vote down, you better pick some other explanation or no explanation at all than this one
May 21, 2014 at 8:12 comment added Amicable This is the best idea so far, it maintains the purpose of the badge while still alleviating the problem caused by gamification.
May 21, 2014 at 6:21 history answered gnat CC BY-SA 3.0