Timeline for Let's have an explicit triage system for questions from new users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2014 at 21:23 | comment | added | gnat | on an unrelated note, would you mind sharing details of a change discussed in recent podcast in related question: Reasoning behind changing the main portal's homepage and focus? | |
| Jul 17, 2014 at 2:37 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | So what's interesting here is that the existing LQ review works really well for answers, but is... kinda broken for questions, where it's pretty much just a really inefficient way of prioritizing things in the Close queue - meaning a question might already have to go through three different queues before it's done. If the final destination for "hopelessly bad" questions was the close queue, with LQ retooled as a "hopelessly bad" option for answers alone, this would save a lot of busywork. | |
| Jul 17, 2014 at 2:33 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | If anyone else had written this, I'd tell them "nice idea, but devoting the resources to rework three queues because one is broken is probably not gonna happen." But... Given you hold the proverbial purse strings there... Nice idea! ;-) | |
| Jul 16, 2014 at 18:25 | history | answered | David Fullerton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |