Timeline for Can we have the old feed back (as an option)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 6, 2015 at 20:45 | comment | added | Ben Collins Mod | @Amo, There are no changes planned. If you got an old-style email you should post it as a bug. | |
| Feb 6, 2015 at 20:37 | comment | added | Arno | @BenCollins: Funny enough, today I received a single message in the old format! Any changes predictable? | |
| Oct 14, 2014 at 14:49 | history | edited | Ben CollinsMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Oct 14, 2014 at 14:09 | history | edited | Ben CollinsMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add link to answer
|
| Oct 14, 2014 at 7:30 | comment | added | Arno | @Ben: Your goal is more engagement and you hide the actual information in at most 10% of the space available for the entire message? Are you sure that this looks more appealing and thus improves the engagement? Can you please be a bit more specific and extend your answer accordingly? | |
| Oct 13, 2014 at 16:32 | comment | added | Ben Collins Mod | @svick yep, I understand, and I'm sure you won't be the only one that feels that way. I think the answer addresses this though - the point is to drive engagement, and visual design has a big impact on that. The thought here is that this will improve overall engagement coming from email subscriptions. | |
| Oct 13, 2014 at 16:29 | comment | added | svick | @BenCollins That mostly answers "Why not have more content in the emails?". Personally, I don't want more content, I want less fluff. | |
| Oct 13, 2014 at 16:19 | comment | added | Ben Collins Mod | @svick here's the best answer: meta.stackexchange.com/a/241939/136973 | |
| Oct 13, 2014 at 16:18 | comment | added | svick | What's the reason for the change? Is it that you're optimizing for people who receive the emails rarely? If that's the case, maybe each first email in a day could use the new full format, but second and following emails in a day could use a simpler format (similar to the old one)? | |
| Oct 13, 2014 at 6:41 | comment | added | Arno | The "bug" tag was not my choice. Initially my post had tags "discussion" and "support". It was not my intention to report this as a bug. That's why I asked for a "users choice" with respect to the new design. I'd suggest to consider a "choice" and monitor the stats to find out what's more appealing. | |
| Oct 13, 2014 at 3:05 | history | answered | Ben CollinsMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |