Timeline for Let's have an explicit triage system for questions from new users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2014 at 7:04 | comment | added | Jack Douglas | You might be interested to know that "Additional just-in-time help (triggered while writing a question) is in the works. " :) | |
| Nov 1, 2014 at 9:08 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft | 2) Some people will feel patronised by this, in particular experts. I’d rather have 100 bad posts than scaring away one expert. 3) On many pages, answers and questions are sufficiently versatile that you cannot make such a categorisation at all. In fact, the only site I can think of, where it might work, is Skeptics. | |
| Nov 1, 2014 at 9:05 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft | While I agree that we should make sure that new users are provided with every information they need for good contributions (and there are some new developments along this line), I do not consider forcing it onto them a good idea for the following reasons: 1) Going from my experience with multiple bad-post offenders, a relevant portion of people are going to circumvent this system and produce bad posts any way. There are sufficiently many people, who will produce bad posts, no matter what you do. | |
| Oct 31, 2014 at 15:24 | history | edited | Sarah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2014 at 14:51 | history | edited | Sarah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 221 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2014 at 14:41 | history | edited | Sarah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
highlighting main ideas and connecting the whole answer to the question.
|
| S Oct 31, 2014 at 14:13 | history | suggested | Christian Rau | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed formatting problems.
|
| Oct 31, 2014 at 14:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 31, 2014 at 14:13 | |||||
| Oct 31, 2014 at 12:48 | history | answered | Sarah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |