Timeline for Make New Users To Read On How To Write an Appropriate Question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 15, 2015 at 13:26 | history | edited | Anthony Pham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 15, 2015 at 7:26 | answer | added | user50049 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 17:16 | vote | accept | Anthony Pham | ||
| Feb 14, 2015 at 17:01 | vote | accept | Anthony Pham | ||
| Feb 14, 2015 at 17:05 | |||||
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:59 | answer | added | Shog9Mod | timeline score: 19 | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:53 | answer | added | OdedStaffMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:45 | history | undeleted | Anthony Pham | ||
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:45 | history | deleted | Anthony Pham | via Vote | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:42 | comment | added | Bart | Because people. People have questions they want to ask. Blabla text blabla. Now let me ask it. How many users don't we get on Meta who simply go "You're right, this will produce opinionated content, but ... but, you are the guys are the smart ones who can answer it" ... | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:41 | comment | added | Anthony Pham | I guess so but why? | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:40 | comment | added | Bart | They are already forced to read through such content and to acknowledge having done so. No amount of text is going to produce good content. | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:38 | history | asked | Anthony Pham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |