Timeline for Make comment flags less stupid
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 22, 2015 at 2:14 | comment | added | apaul | @Wrzlprmft Ihad the same feeling about "unwelcoming" in Robert's answer. meta.stackexchange.com/questions/252844/… | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 18:53 | comment | added | Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL | As a relatively new "flagger," this seems to be the most useful list. The more description provided, the easier it will be to know which flag to use and why, potentially making less work for the moderators. I like the link to the Be Nice policy, and wonder if we might find links for any of the other categories. I also prefer "An answer" with description to @Robert's "answer posted as a comment." In my opinion, an educated flagger is a responsible flagger! | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 11:51 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft | I disagree with not nice, because some people will misunderstand this unintentionally or intentionally to apply to anything that is not “pretty please with sugar on top”. For example, while this very comment is (hopefully) not rude or offensive, there is nothing in it that makes it particular nice and thus one might regard it as not nice. It is however not not nice if you only define things as not nice that contain explicitly unnice stuff. While using nice works for “Be nice!” due to context, it does not work here. | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 10:58 | history | answered | Esoteric Screen Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |