Timeline for Is there a Stack Exchange site for Law Questions? If not, why not? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 1, 2015 at 18:18 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Jul 2, 2015 at 2:34 | |||||
Jun 11, 2015 at 22:01 | comment | added | Gary Barrett | Not sure when it launched, but it looks like there is now a site for this at law.stackexchange.com | |
May 27, 2015 at 21:19 | comment | added | jvriesem | If SX did create a Law site, there would probably have to be a disclaimer somewhere to this effect: "ignorantia legis neminem excusat" (ignorance of the law excuses nobody). A Law SX site could HELP direct people to the right resources (e.g. legal documents) for better info, and people could even advise others, but all of this is with the understanding that it may not be solid advice. | |
May 27, 2015 at 21:17 | comment | added | jvriesem | @ArulxZ: "Any stupid troll has freedom to answer any law question and this can result into serious problems." --> This is true for ANY StackExchange (SX) site, which is why SX has a system of voting, reputation and commentary to help the interested reader evaluate the quality and reliability of answers. It's not a perfect system, but anyone who thinks it is probably doesn't belong on the internet in the first place. :-) | |
Apr 22, 2015 at 9:08 | comment | added | TheMightyLlama | @Aryan, just like any other stackoverflow... | |
Jan 11, 2015 at 20:38 | comment | added | antony.trupe | area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/67858/law is currently in the Commitment phase. | |
Dec 25, 2014 at 8:19 | comment | added | Confuse | I think this is a really bad idea. Any stupid troll has freedom to answer any law question and this can result into serious problems... | |
Jul 1, 2014 at 19:00 | comment | added | jcubic | There is proposal area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/67858/law | |
Nov 21, 2013 at 18:17 | history | closed |
ben is uǝq backwards Manishearth Martijn Pieters Hugo Dozois George StockerMod |
Duplicate of How can I propose a new site? | |
Nov 21, 2013 at 16:58 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 21, 2013 at 18:18 | |||||
Nov 21, 2013 at 16:35 | comment | added | Daniel | ^ links broken. | |
Nov 21, 2013 at 16:31 | answer | added | Daniel | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 26, 2012 at 23:14 | comment | added | user149432 | Related: Why “Software Law” was closed and Why “Intellectual Property Law” was closed on Area 51. | |
Jun 20, 2012 at 19:08 | answer | added | nealmcb | timeline score: 22 | |
Jun 20, 2012 at 14:10 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
better title
|
Oct 13, 2011 at 21:23 | comment | added | doncherry | This belongs on Area 51? There already are proposals for that, but none in beta. | |
May 13, 2011 at 15:59 | answer | added | Pollyanna | timeline score: 51 | |
May 13, 2011 at 13:16 | answer | added | user1228 | timeline score: 105 | |
May 13, 2011 at 7:53 | history | edited | fretje | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Oct 10, 2009 at 5:56 | answer | added | pkaeding | timeline score: 12 | |
Oct 9, 2009 at 21:08 | vote | accept | Mark P Neyer | ||
Oct 9, 2009 at 20:58 | history | asked | Mark P Neyer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |