Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 24, 2015 at 12:13 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @wythagoras yes I know. The bug is when you put anything but 1 as the value of "deleted" operator. For what's it's worth, the bug is already reported for 8 days, without any hint of attention. | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 12:11 | comment | added | wythagoras |
@ShadowWizard This is really weird. If I search for deleted:1 user:6000 I get my own deleted posts, but if I search for deleted:all user:6000, I get all user:6000's posts, including his deleted posts.
|
|
| Dec 24, 2015 at 12:08 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @wythagoras that's because Geoff doesn't have any deleted posts on that site. Try with other user, and you will see his/her deleted posts. (you will see ALL posts, but including deleted posts) Just to prove it's working, I found this deleted question of yours just now. | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 12:02 | comment | added | wythagoras | @ShadowWizard I get: "Note: only content you own is returned when searching for deleted content". I'm quite sure this is intentional, not a bug. | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 12:00 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @wythagoras just see for yourself. (actually I can't see it myself having less than 10k there, but hope you get the point now :)) | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:59 | comment | added | wythagoras | @ShadowWizard Can you clarify? | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:58 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @wythagoras well, we can actually but this is most likely a bug. | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:55 | comment | added | wythagoras | @ShadowWizard Just adding user:me for completeness sake, in case it once will change (i.e. that you can see all deleted posts) | |
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:48 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard |
@wythagoras you don't need the user:me, unless you have a diamond.
|
|
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:48 | history | edited | wythagoras | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 301 characters in body
|
| Dec 17, 2015 at 20:54 | comment | added | wythagoras | @JonEricson This is now status-completed, because you implemented deleted:1 user:me | |
| Oct 23, 2015 at 18:22 | history | edited | Jon EricsonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I'm leaving my feedback as edits to these answers. I'm sorry, but I'm declining this one for now.
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:20 | comment | added | TylerH | Yes please. Deleted questions and answers to deleted questions. | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 13:00 | comment | added | Pollyanna |
If the deleted: searches are enabled, then this comes along with it but only for interested users: user:me deleted:? - So I'd simply rather have that enabled. Then those users who want to see their own deleted stuff can, and it doesn't appear on their private page.
|
|
| Apr 17, 2015 at 5:51 | comment | added | Jeremy | I strongly disagree with this proposal just because this really should be accessible to all users, and establishing it as a reputation privilege makes it less likely that that will ever happen. High-reputation users aren't the only ones who put lots of effort into posts and don't deserve to have them lost. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 2:21 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | One of the folks who soured me on it had 22K, @pizza - I'm skeptical. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 1:08 | comment | added | user259867 | @Shog9 But those would be the folks relatively new to the system? By 30K or so, one has to get used to how deletion works. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:11 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | Even the 60-day window has generated a certain amount of noise from folks who absolutely cannot stand that their deleted posts are still in the system, regardless of visibility. I'd want to put a lot more thought into this before considering it. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:58 | comment | added | Jon Ericson StaffMod | I don't see what your age has to do... oh. Wait. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:58 | comment | added | bjb568 | @pizza There are many ways to define a small subset of users besides rep. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:56 | comment | added | user259867 | @bjb It was prophesied that this ability "would result in unbearable amounts of wailing, gnashing of teeth, meta complaints, Twitter rants, cats sleeping with dogs, CHAOS..." Restricting access to a small subset of users would mitigate that. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:51 | comment | added | bjb568 | We don't need any more "view vote count" privileges. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:51 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | @bjb568 Seconded. This would be nice to have at any level. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:49 | comment | added | bjb568 | I don't see why this should be related to rep. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:48 | history | answered | Taryn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |