Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackapps.com/ with https://stackapps.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:51 | history | edited | wythagoras | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 1:32 | history | edited | Jon EricsonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Thank you for the suggestion. I really wish I could make it happen.
|
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:45 | comment | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | @NᴏᴠɪᴄᴇIɴDɪsɢᴜɪsᴇ high-rep regulars can and do already figure out who name-change users are on the non-massive (non-SO) sites, this would just save the hassle of hitting the user profile and scrolling until you see an answer you recognise. So I think this makes perfect sense as a high-rep-only mini-privilege, "we know you'll do this anyway so we made it easy" | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 11:12 | comment | added | J Sargent | @AwesomePoodles I think chat-like highlights would be better. Past names seems like it shouldn't be put out there. The user probably changed it for a reason. | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 3:41 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | @NoviceInDisguise, see the linked feature request (and the dozens of duplicate and linked posts from that). There are many reasons but the main one for me is that many comment sequences make little sense due to name changes. | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 1:02 | comment | added | corsair992 | Again if this feature is implemented, then why should it be restricted to high-rep users? The whole problem here is artificial limitation to start with, and your proposed solution just lowers that limitation to include yourself, instead of eliminating it altogether as it should be. | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 0:42 | comment | added | J Sargent | Can you explain why this is a good idea? | |
| May 2, 2015 at 5:10 | history | answered | Awesome Poodles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |