Timeline for What is a "spam seed"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2022 at 19:08 | comment | added | 9pfs | @EricLippert When that day comes, moderation will no longer be needed. | |
| May 19, 2015 at 6:02 | history | migrated | from security.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Apr 1, 2015 at 16:18 | vote | accept | peterh | ||
| Mar 25, 2015 at 23:14 | comment | added | Dewi Morgan | My response in such a case (where spam becomes on-topic content) is usually "what an enviable problem to have!" If spammers post questions that matter to real people, that's OK! Other than closing as dups if they repeat themselves, and deleting spam replies, no action need be taken on the seeds themselves. Most products are designed to fill a need; all needs have legitimate questions to describe them. Legitimate questions are good content. | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 23:09 | comment | added | Eric Lippert | @Vi.: That would be awesome! And is the punch line of xkcd.com/810 | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 21:26 | comment | added | Vi. | "The quality ... so terrible" may be a temporary state. Imagine a world where "too good, too ideal" posts are actually bot-generated. | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 9:13 | history | answered | Bart | CC BY-SA 3.0 |