Timeline for Link-only answers: bad. But what about link-only tag wikis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gis.stackexchange.com/ with https://gis.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 22:11 | comment | added | PolyGeo | @unor I think we are on different pages for this issue, and I encourage you to include a few more words of your own around any tag wikis that you post. There's no need for treatises to qualify as a tag wiki - I think just a few paragraphs is great, and one paragraph is fine as a starter. | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 22:07 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 22:00 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 451 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 21:55 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 451 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:44 | comment | added | unor | Just to make sure that we are on the same page (as you don’t list reasons for why you think they should be rejected): This is an example edit the OP is asking about. It’s not "a bare URL", but a list of 5 hyperlinks and corresponding labels. -- In your opinion, should edits like these also "be rejected"? | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 11:23 | history | answered | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |