Timeline for Link-only answers: bad. But what about link-only tag wikis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 18, 2015 at 12:28 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @unor The entry seemed "value-added" because it was a compilation of references on the subject. That's not quite as bad as saying "See Wikipedia entry on [subject]", but it's not ideal either. | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:33 | comment | added | unor | You approved several of the tag wiki edits the OP, Johnny Bones, asks about in this discussion. Would you decide differently now? Or are such edits not what you mean with this answer? Or might it depend on the site (beta) and activity (low)? | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 15:53 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 15:45 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |