Timeline for Consider using migration from per-site Metas as only path to Meta SE for low rep users?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2018 at 7:35 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 295 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 10, 2015 at 5:04 | vote | accept | PolyGeo | ||
| Jul 9, 2015 at 6:55 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 6:42 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Reduced suggested rep level from 20K to 1K
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 6:15 | answer | added | psubsee2003 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:56 | answer | added | user259867 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:56 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | No, there is no rep limit on MSE. See Remove Meta Privilege for MSE (only) for the reason for that "privilege". | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:49 | comment | added | PolyGeo | Don't they need 5 to participate here too? The thought behind my suggestion is as a filter. Low rep users could still get their views/ideas here via migration but it would mean a much higher signal to noise ratio arriving here, that then needs to be processed by the "high rep users on MSE". | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:43 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | So a user who has an issue on a site but does not have 5 rep? Do they not have a voice at all? By treating MSE as a "high-rep members only" club, you are further isolating low rep users. Low rep users should be encouraged to participate in meta to help them learn the site. The 5 rep barrier exists on child metas as spam/off-topic prevention, but MSE should still be open to them. There is more than enough high rep users on MSE to keep the site clean | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:40 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:39 | comment | added | PolyGeo | @psubsee2003 Wouldn't we want them to be accumulating some reputation on per-site Mains (and then support for their ideas on those Metas) before seeking to change the whole SE network via Meta SE? | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:35 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | And for the users without 5 rep to post on a child meta? Where would they go? | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:31 | history | edited | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 5:26 | history | asked | PolyGeo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |