Timeline for Why vote for suggested-edits when you can edit yourself?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2015 at 13:23 | history | edited | Fish Below the Ice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:37 | history | edited | Patrick Hofman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 75 characters in body
|
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:36 | history | edited | Wolph | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 46 characters in body
|
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:15 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Related/dupe: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/119232/… | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:14 | comment | added | M.A.R. | @ᔕᖺᘎᕊ they say that one can accept/reject and edit and change something trivial (like an space) so that their one vote applies to the suggested edit, rather than just approving/rejecting so that there'll be a need for others to "vote". | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:13 | comment | added | Wolph | @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M: when looking at the suggested edits dashboard, I agree. When you are looking at a question anyhow you're usually (or at least I am) more thorough in looking at the edit anyhow. | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:12 | comment | added | M.A.R. | I always thought editing is harder than voting; but I see your point. | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:12 | vote | accept | Wolph | ||
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:14 | |||||
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:11 | history | edited | S.L. Barth is on codidact.com | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed typography.
|
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:08 | comment | added | Wolph | @ᔕᖺᘎᕊ: yes, I mean approve/reject. The main issue here is that I'm trying to make questions readable so I can answer them. If someone else already tried that I just want to apply those changes so I don't have to look at a horribly formatted question. | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 11:08 | answer | added | Patrick Hofman | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 17, 2015 at 10:54 | history | asked | Wolph | CC BY-SA 3.0 |