Timeline for RFC: Better chat @mentions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 19:18 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | @JoshCaswell I've no idea how often that would happen, I did focus on the intentional misuse. If the accidental misuse is a significant factor, the limit should certainly remain there. | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 19:18 | history | edited | Mad Scientist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 127 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 19:15 | comment | added | jscs | "Adding another way to be annoying doesn't really change anything." It does if the new way is easier to do, especially if it's easier to do unintentionally. | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:44 | comment | added | user259867 | If there is no 7 day restriction and the exact username pings, that will probably result in unintentional pings by those who are used to @ just as a way of referencing others. "Yay, I just found an answer by @JonSkeet that solved my problem". | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:09 | history | edited | Mad Scientist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:04 | history | answered | Mad Scientist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |